New Deal Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian Means - 714 Words

The men who served as president during their terms before FDR either focused on Hamiltonian or Jeffersonian views when making decisions for the country. They either focused on the government having more control, or on the common man having the control. FDR, on the other hand, used a combination of the two. The New Deal was created solely to improve the conditions of the United States during the Great Depression. The successes and failures of FDR’s combination of â€Å"Hamiltonian means† to achieve â€Å"Jeffersonian ends† are reflected by the New Deal with the occurrence and extremism of the court-packing scheme, the outcome of the National Industrial Recovery Ac t, and the New Deal programs helping the common man while increasing the government’s involvement. The New Deal specifically reflects FDR’s combination of â€Å"Hamiltonian means† to achieve â€Å"Jeffersonian ends† in the events of the court-packing scheme. FDR’s actual actions in this event are Hamiltonian because he is involving himself in the functions of Congress, which is big government, but his goal was Jeffersonian. His goal in this scheme was to add a member of Congress (Democrat) for every member over the age of seventy. His reasoning for this was to have more representatives of the Democratic Party to see things his way, which would hopefully â€Å"achieve Jeffersonian ends.† His extremist, Hamiltonian actions of packing the court were set up to benefit the forgotten man in the end by way of the New Deal programs being passed.Show MoreRelatedEmergence of a Two-Party System 1789-18081405 Words   |  6 PagesIn 1789, the two men who were the leaders of the two parties that were to emerge were Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Bo th Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had a major influence during this time. Hamilton was an active delegate for New York at the Constitutional Convention, the main author of the Federalist papers and the first Secretary of the Treasury for the United States. He was the leader of the Federalist Party. Jefferson was the author of the Declaration of Independence, UnitedRead MoreThe Politics Of Party Realignment1838 Words   |  8 Pagesrecognized that a new issues arose around the elections of 1800, 1828, 1860, 1896, and 1932 and that the Presidents who won those elections all benefited by taking a stance on that issue. The 1800 realignment was the decline of the Federalist party and the rise of the Democrats and the Republicans. The federalist lost a lot of seats in Congress and had a hard time competing for the Presidency and in 1820 didn’t run a candidate in the 1820 election. The Hamiltonians and the Jeffersonians squared of overRead MoreModernization Essay1296 Words   |  6 Pageslaid the foundation for the industrial modernization, it doubled the size of the United states and gave the country control of the port of New Orleans and gave us territory for westward expansion. Jefferson abandons his belief of a strict interpretation of the constitution when he approves the purchase to benefit the people. This is Hamiltonian means for Jeffersonian ends, meaning he does something Federalists would do to benefit the people. He further increases the power the national govt has by limitingRead MoreEssay on Political Transitions in America2833 Words   |  12 Pagesbegan in the new world many people that have traveled wanted to live in a new atmosphere. People sought out wealth, fortune, freedom and wanted to express their ideas and beliefs as they could have not in their own countries. The new world gave these settlers an opportunity to start their new lives and way of life. One aspect of their new lives was how they wanted to be ruled and their political ideas. Political transitions have occurred throughout the beginning of the settlement of the new world fromRead MoreFeds vs Anti-Feds3174 Words   |  13 PagesEcclesiastes says, â€Å"There’s nothing new under the sun.† 1) How did the political philosophies of these men differ? Most clear thinking Americans could probably tell you at least the rudimentary facts of who Thomas Jefferson was. Far fewer would likely have a definite idea of who Alexander Hamilton was and what his contributions as a Founding Father were. Yet his conception of an American government was just as important as that of Jefferson. Both founders foresaw the new nation as a great future powerRead MoreGreat Inventors Changed our World3233 Words   |  13 PagesDestiny providing them a way to travel west. In exchange the American pioneers created business and traded through the road, leading to later constructing towns to settle in. 4.The Louisiana Purchase of 1803 is the greatest real estate deal in history. This was a land deal between the United States and France at a price of around $15 million for over 800,000 square miles of land. This land was bought because the Americans feared that France will pose a threat. It was the greatest achievement of ThomasRead MoreMixed Economy7299 Words   |  30 Pagestheir base in human life. Under socialism, control of property is put into the hands of society as a whole. The first effect of this is that people cannot be independent. They cannot live on their own efforts, because there goods will be stolen. This means that to live, they must act in accordance with the wishes of society. They are enslaved. The destruction of property rights has an additional effect, though. It destroys the efficacy of ones mind. Without the freedom to act in accordance with onesRead More Eighteenth Century Religious Change in Uncle Toms Cabin and Moby Dick5788 Words   |  24 Pagesoccur red, the sharp delineation and definition which some authors attempt is not a useful method. Rather, it is most helpful to address the religious aspect of both Melville and Stowes works as part of a movement away from earlier Calvinist ideas into a new climate which could address the circumstances of their day. Neither one of them can be precisely placed in any of the religious categories of the period; Calvinism (both orthodox and reformed), Unitarianism, Transcendentalism, and liberal Christocentric